VC AMD Radeon R9 290X with Hawaii GPU shown
It's going to at least beat your 780. I kinda wish it wasn't true because it's giving us tons of buyers remorse more than my dual watercooled 7970s that I fell $850 just 3 months ago (because I bet against the Hawaii collection and underestimated AMD), but now My spouse and i already wanna dump these individuals asap so i can get one of these. I understand the raw power of dual 7970s will be better than this 290X having said that i know the 290X will be a smoother practical experience and the observable frame prices will be about the same due to the body pacing issues of the CFX 7970s, even after the "frame pacing fix".
AMD is taking this GPU so far as they possibly can on 28nm. Although the process size is the same as Tahiti, they are still ** it a product ought to have being called a new technology.
Also, I really like the look of in which cooler. I hope its the final version.
I don't understand how most of these conclusions are made when we truly don't have official specs.
The purpose I'm trying to make is how aged the 7970 is in terms of GPU tech, I see no less than any 780 performance wise stock as opposed to stock. Anything less would have been a waste for them. If this 512bit bus is true, who knows what more may be in store for these gpu's. Perhaps I'm biased here on the other hand feel when we look back in a short time the 7970 is going to be heralded similar to the 8800gt was IMO, especially considering it really is lifetime and constant upgrades.
GK104 has 192GB/s and loses so that you can 150GB/s 7870 at 1080p with 8xMSAA when you benchmark for VRAM bandwidth.
It's more than, Nvidia is relegated to 1080p rig status. This is probably going to be the simply thing remotely capable of forcing 1440p and better on next generation console ports. This thing is definitely gonna have 100GB/s more theoretical more than GTX 780, and as Tom's showed in their "testing to get bandwidth limitations" review Nvidia theoretical bandwidth isn't close to AMD theoretical bandwidth.
But I accomplish like how the top Hawaii is being saved for FirePro. How it happened guys? I thought AMD was going to concentrate on APUs only? You mean they are focusing the most on high quality HSA workstations?
Not to mention die measurements Hawaii is like 420mm^2 (yeah, framework the bundle 420 yolo) and GK110 is just about 550mm^2.
Gk110 is about 30% bigger than Hawaii. Meaning AMD can charge 30% less and if they certainly better than 30% behind Gk110 then there's a great GPU on their hands in regards to die size to help performance.
And look at that, 30% off GTX 780 price of $649 on newegg is almost precisely $449. If this thing is 15% slow than Titan or GTX 780 and it comes in at $449, it's going to be a heck of a offer.
GK104 has 192GB/s and loses to be able to 150GB/s 7870 at 1080p with 8xMSAA when you standard for VRAM bandwidth.
It's around, Nvidia is relegated to 1080p rig status. This is probably going to be the just thing remotely capable of moving 1440p and better on next era console ports. This thing can be gonna have 100GB/s more theoretical more than GTX 780, and as Tom's showed in their "testing pertaining to bandwidth limitations" review Nvidia theoretical bandwidth seriously isn't close to AMD theoretical bandwidth.
But I accomplish like how the top Hawaii is being saved for FirePro. What actually happened
Timberland Boots Canada guys? I thought AMD was going to target APUs only? You mean these are focusing the most on top rated HSA workstations?
Not to mention die measurements Hawaii is like 420mm^2 (yeah, structure the bundle 420 yolo) and GK110 is around
Hollister Singapore 550mm^2.
Gk110 is about 30% bigger than Hawaii. Which means AMD can charge 30% less and if they actually do better than 30% behind Gk110 then there's a great
Louis Vuitton Outlet GPU on their hands and wrists in regards to die size for you to performance.
And look at that, 30% away from GTX 780 price of $649 on newegg is almost specifically $449. If this thing is 15% sluggish than Titan or GTX 780 and it measures $449,
Cheap Nike ** 90 it's going to be a heck of a bargain.
I believe you're being overly dramatic but it has been stated that AMD has been teaming program Adobe to support Premiere.
8xx msaa isn't the minimize for Nvidia.
Since a lot of non fanboy Nvidia users buy Nvidia due to need for CUDA for Adobe Premiere and other these types of applications that don't make use of Quadro motorists this could be a big win with regard to AMD if they get their driver concerns and perception issues taken care of.
Some applications don't take advantage of CUDA at all, such as AutoCAD (the 3D mode), but just happen to manage better on Geforces.
On the other side compute applications are wrecked by AMD card, such as Autodesk Developer, Monte Carlo/Biniomial Option pricing, crypto; seats such as GPU Caps Audience PostFX (originally part of Nvidia's development set) and BasemarkCL I'd say GCN has a lot of untapped potential. OpenCL has only endured since 2009 after all.
And if you compare the success AMD has made with GCN, which executes well even under 8x Alcoholics anonymous (unlike Fermi and Cayman), I'd express they made huge progress. Hat, the hugely popular MATLAB toolbox has started to support OpenCL. Simulation plans such as SIMULIA and ABAQUS support OpenCL, but the most widely used simulation program, ANSYS , uses CUDA compute acceleration that is only backed on Quadro K5000 /5000 and above ($2K GPUs are generally out of reach for most people anyhow).
All of us already see Dell, HP , in addition to Lenovo implementing Firepros into their ultrabook workstations plus Apple is using Firepro in their completely new Mac Pro.
